The purpose of this implementation strategy is to guide Bryan ISD Pre-K teachers through the successful adoption of Seesaw as a tool for embedding authentic assessment into daily instruction. My innovation plan identifies what changes are needed, and this implementation strategy explains how those changes will become sustainable. My strategy combines The Four Disciplines of Execution for Educators (Covey et al., 2026), which I will refer to as 4DX, with the Influencer Model (Patterson & Grenny, 2013) to address both execution and behavior change.
My innovation plan will create a district-wide system in which assessment is embedded into authentic learning experiences through a digital portfolio called Seesaw. This will reduce time spent on isolated one on one pull-out style assessments and increase the visibility of student learning for teachers and families.
This is important because most teachers have too many priorities and mandates. The demands of the job from day to day along with the constant bombardment of district accountability measures create what Covey et al. (2026) refers to as the whirlwind. Instead of trying to improve everything all at the same time, the focus will be on one goal also known as a "Wildly Important Goal (WIG). "As we have said, some goals are more important than others. And a few goals are "wildly" important. We define a "Wildly Important Goal" (a WIG) as a goal that you must reach or nothing else you achieve really matters very much" (Covey et al., 2026, p.22).
Year 1 WIG: By the end of the 2027 school year, 90% of Pre-K teachers will consistently use Seesaw to document authentic learning during centers and small-group instruction, resulting in at least one documented learning artifact per instructional day.
Year 2 WIG: By May 2028, 90% of Pre-K students will have digital portfolios containing documented evidence from authentic learning experiences across all report card domains, allowing teachers to use embedded assessment as their primary source of student performance data.
"Where a lag measure tells you whether you have achieved your goal, a lead measure tells you how you will achieve your goal" (Covey et al., 2026, p.57).
Other than coming up with an effective WIG, determining lead measures needs to be taken seriously. It may take time and lots of investigation to determine what the lead measures should be. "Finding the right lever among many possibilites is perhaps the toughest and most intriguing challenge for leaders trying to execute a WIG" (Covey et al., 2026, p.71). The wrong lead measure could create the illusion of progress when it might really just be a way to check off the boxes without effecting any real world progress. For instance, if the lead measure is that teachers need five artifacts posted per student each week this could lead to low level compliance. If we're not measuring and defining the quality of work being posted then we're missing the point. The goal is to facilitate and document authentic learning experiences whereas simply counting any documentation doesn't necessarily mean it's quality. This is why it's so important to define the lead measure and then follow up with WIG meetings and data discussions in PLCs (Discipline 4).
Lag Measure:
90% of teachers consistently using Seesaw
Lead Measures:
Teachers plan one authentic documentation opportunity each day.
Teachers ensure students capture at least one authentic learning artifact during centers or small group rotations.
Teachers bring Seesaw evidence to PLC meetings.
Each teacher will maintain an individual 4DX scoreboard that tracks progress on the team's lead measures. During weekly PLC WIG meetings, teachers will update their scoreboards, celebrate wins, discuss barriers, and make commitments for the coming week. Campus leaders and instructional coaches will review trends to provide support rather than to evaluate performance.
Keeping score is a critical component because people are more motivated and engaged when a meaningful score is kept. Yet another component of successful score keeping is that teachers should be allowed to create and keep their own scoreboard. If the scoreboard is imposed upon them from above they will likely view it as evaluative and not have the same level of drive nor ownsership that's necessary to achieve the WIG. Of course the scoreboard needs to be measuring the lead measures properly, but allowing teachers agency increases their motivation and sense of ownership which also aligns with the COVA model (Harapnuik & Thibodeaux, 2023). Furthermore, keeping a complelling scoreboard increases a sense of purpose for teachers because they can actually measure and attain true success. This really taps into a deep psychological need. In Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us one researcher found that "the single greatest motivator is making progress in one's work.' The days that people make progress are the days they feel most motivated and engaged" (Pink, 2011, p.127)
Scoreboards need to comply with these rules (Covey et al., 2026, p.113):
Scoreboards must be simple.
The team must be able to see the scoreboard.
The scoreboard should show both lag and lead measures.
Team member must be able to tell immediately if they are winning or losing.
Team members create and update the scoreboard themselves.
Personal data should not appear on public scoreboards.
"This is the discipline that brings all of the team members together to execute a shared WIG, and that is why it is at the top of the 4 Disciplines pyramid" (Covey et al., 2026, p.127). During weekly PLC meetings, teachers review their lead measures, share evidence of authentic learning collected in Seesaw, celebrate progress, identify barriers, and commit to one specific action before the next meeting. This consistent cycle of reflection and accountability helps ensure that documenting authentic learning becomes a sustainable instructional practice rather than a short-term initiative.
Every PLC the meeting begins with a WIG session that should last only 10-15 minutes.
Each meeting includes three questions (Covey et al., 2026, p.122):
What commitments did I make?
Did I complete them?
What will I commit to before next meeting?
Each meeting follows these three rules (Covey et al., 2026, p.123):
Hold WIG sessions regularly and frequently.
Make WIG sessions brief.
Never allow the whirlwind into the WIG session.
Graphic created with OpenAI (2026)
Graphic created with OpenAI (2026)
Covey, S., Kosinski, L., Wierda, B., & Fleming, M. B. (2026). The 4 disciplines of execution for educators: Helping schools and districts achieve their wildly important goals. Simon & Schuster.
Harapnuik, Dwayne; Thibodeaux, Tilisa (2023). COVA: Inspire Learning Through Choice, Ownership, Voice, and Authentic Experiences. (2nd ed.). Learner's Mindset Publishing.
OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (July 2026 version) [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com/
Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us. Penguin.